Einstein’s general relativity teaches us that time and space are not absolute. They bend and shift depending on motion, mass, and perspective. In a universe of relative frames, only one thing remains constant: the speed of light.
But if light is the one universal constant, approximately 300,000 kilometers per second, then why do we still measure it using meters and seconds — both of which are human inventions? Doesn't this choice contradict the deeper philosophical implications of relativity itself?
To explore this, we must revisit the origins of these units.
Time, as we measure it, was derived from the Earth's rotation — long before we understood that Earth orbits the Sun. We once believed the Sun "rose" and "set."
Distance evolved from physical standards — like rods of metal — calibrated by the dimensions of human bodies or landmarks. Yet under varying conditions, these rods contract, expand, and deform. How "universal" is a unit that bends with its environment?
The history of physics is full of elegant frameworks:
Newton gave us gravity.
Maxwell gave us the electromagnetic field.
Einstein gave us relativity.
But as physics shifted from the macroscopic to the microscopic, our models became increasingly abstract. We now describe matter in terms of invisible entities: atoms, nuclei, electrons, quarks, ions, bosons. Many of these have never been directly observed — only inferred through experimental signatures.
And still, we rely on mathematics to give us confidence.
In school, we’re taught that experiments are “successful” if the data forms a clean line or a tidy curve. Deviation is called "noise." A perfect fit is taken as truth.
But what if this elegance conceals a deeper limitation?
If light is the constant, and our theories are built atop it, have we truly explained reality? Or have we merely described it — from the perspective of beings moving unimaginably slowly compared to light itself?
Unlike the Standard Model, the Entropy-Decay Theory does not describe matter in terms of flowing, twisting, or colliding particles. Instead, we treat each atom as a container of entropy, capable of only two essential actions: intake or release. This reorients our perspective away from the behavior of individual atoms and toward the system as a whole.
In classical thermodynamics, entropy is treated as disorder — a chaotic byproduct, often labeled as “noise.” In this framework, however, entropy is not a consequence, but the origin of all observed phenomena. Entropy increase is not a result; it is the trigger. The verification of entropy propagation — especially between structural decay steps — becomes the central focus of material physics.
Thus, in the Entropy-Decay Theory, we are not seeking relationships between space and time. Instead, we study the flow of entropy between atoms, across systems, and between celestial bodies. We do not ask what happened when t = 0, but what marked the first step of entropy increase — when ꚍ = 1.
Under this interpretation, planets like Earth are not simply formed by material accretion, but by entropy collapse. The Earth’s curvature gradient acts as an entropic attractor, drawing in surrounding matter. In response to this gradient, we perceive gravity and define mass.
This leads to a key conclusion: materials that have trapped more entropy at the atomic level are heavier and tend to be found deeper underground. This fits what modern science observes — heavy materials, such as uranium, serve as key sources of nuclear energy. In contrast, light behaves as the fastest form of entropy propagation. Though massless, even light is influenced by local entropic curvature, which explains its bending near massive bodies.
From this insight, we developed a 33-dimensional model — not as a replacement for spatial dimensions, nor in search of mathematical perfection, but to describe the freedoms of entropy propagation. This model begins at -1D, where materials fail to hold structure and decay begins; passes through 0D, a state of perfect stillness; and culminates at 32D, where entropy collapses into a black hole. Each dimension adds a new degree of entropic freedom — describing the system’s readiness for structural decay. With this framework, all physical phenomena — from phase transitions to nuclear chain reactions — are reinterpreted under the logic of entropy-decay.
As we shift from the Standard Model of particle physics to the Entropy-Decay framework, we propose four core hypotheses that challenge classical assumptions about light, cosmology, material structure, and energy:
1. Light as Maximum Entropy Propagation
In the Standard Model, light is treated as a duality: sometimes a particle (photon), sometimes a wave — its nature shifting depending on observation.
Under the Entropy-Decay Theory, light is not a duality but the maximum possible form of entropy propagation. It is massless not because it lacks substance, but because it carries pure entropy flow. What we interpret as “particle” or “wave” behavior is shaped by experimental boundary conditions and the selectivity of measurement — not by the intrinsic nature of light itself.
2. The Universe as a Steady State with Correlated Big Bangs
Instead of a single Big Bang event, we propose that the universe is a steady-state field in which multiple galaxy-scale entropic collapses occur. Each localized “Big Bang” is triggered by entropy gradients from neighboring systems. Once a galaxy reaches equilibrium, it may emit entropy that induces collapse in adjacent regions — forming a chain of correlated galactic genesis events.
In this view, the solar system could have formed only ~4.6 billion years ago, far more recently than the 13.8 billion years predicted by ΛCDM cosmology. This aligns with entropy-based collapse timing, not with an absolute cosmic age tied to a universal t = 0. Instead, the question becomes: when did τ = 1 begin for each region?
3. Carbon as an Entropic Leftover, Not a Creative Base
Carbon is not the origin of organic matter, but the residue of entropic equilibrium under Earth’s specific curvature conditions. What burns to carbon — ash, CO, CO₂ — is not proof that everything is built from carbon, but that carbon is what remains after entropy is extracted.
In this hypothesis, burning is an entropy extraction process, and carbon is the steady-state product of that process under Earth’s entropic gradient. If that gradient were different, we might burn into something else. For example, silica (sand) may be the leftover entropy phase of a prior Earth — possibly the era of the dinosaurs — explaining why fossilized remains are buried in sand, not ash.
4. Energy via Resonant Entropy Release — Not Just Burning or Collision
In conventional physics, energy is extracted through burning (chemical potential) or smashing (kinetic potential). But if matter is a store of trapped entropy, then energy can also be released via resonant triggering.
Each material has a decay frequency — much like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse or a glass shattering from high pitch. When exposed to a matching external entropy input (e.g., light, voltage), a material can enter a second entropy cascade — releasing stored energy without destruction.
This explains why silica-based materials emit light when electrically stimulated (e.g., in LEDs) and also why sunlight can trigger current in silica: in both cases, the material is not a semiconductor in the traditional sense, but a resonantly responsive entropy container.
Together, these four hypotheses define a theory where entropy is not the byproduct of the universe — it is the architecture of it.
Final Full Unified Equation (Pure Entropic Form)
For entire systems: quantum, gravity, structure, emergence, cosmology
(∂²S)/(∂τ²) = α ∇Ψ² S + β ∂²/(∂τ²) (∇Ψ² S) + γ Σ ξₙ · Λₙ(τ)
This equation expresses the second-order evolution of entropy S in relation to decay-based progression τ, spatial projection Ψ, and stochastic entropic contributions. It unites diverse physical phenomena under a singular irreducible principle: the irreversible, directional transformation of structure through entropy.
This formulation represents the core proposal of this work and a potential path forward for future reinterpretation of quantum mechanics, gravity, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism through a post-spacetime lens.
Variable Definitions: